Posted by: chatblu on: November 30, 2009
The Republicans are at it again. They have developed a conservative litmus test by which all candidates are measured. The misfits who do not ring the bell at 80% will find that funding will be withheld from their campaigns. Once again, while I rarely agree with the Repubs, I admire their purpose-driven agenda in many respects. I had initially planned to write an essay regarding a progressive version, but that’s already been done, so let’s just criticize theirs – it’s more fun, anyway.
I am listing the stipulations below in essence rather than in whole, so we don’t go blind reading our way through a forest of “whereases”.
1. Support for smaller government, smaller national debt, lower deficits, and lower taxes by opposition to Obama’s stimulus bills and their ilk.
2. Support for market-based health care reform and opposition to ObamaCare.
3. Support for market-based energy reforms and opposition to cap and trade.
4. Support for a worker’s right to secret ballots and opposition to card check.
5. Support for legal immigration and assimilation into American society by opposing general amnesty.
6. Support for victory in Iraq and Afghanistan through military recommended troop surges.
7. Containment of Iran and North Korea, and elimination of their nuclear threat.
8. Support for the Defense of Marriage Act.
9. Opposition to health care rationing, denial of health care, and government funding for abortions.
10. Support the second amendment.
Let’s parse their list:
1. Good thing that the Republican Party has suddenly disavowed Bush the Lesser, since he presided over the most remarkable expansion of government since LBJ. Seems to me that the Republican-dominated Congress fought tooth and claw to give Bush everything that he demanded lest they join the ranks of the “unpatriotic”. Guess they have seen the light.
2. “Market-based health care reform” is a real winner, guys. Insurance regulation is a States’ Right. You cannot have this both ways. The individual states decide who may and may not sell insurance in their states, which has led to virtual monopolies in any number of areas. States do not have to permit the selling of insurance across state lines. As the Republicans stand firmly upon the Tenth Amendment, this will be a tough sell.
3. “Market-based energy reform” is another doozie. If I become unhappy with FP&L (Fl@rida Power and Light aka Fl@rida Plunder and Loot), I should just find a competitor, say maybe the Tennessee Valley Authority and hook up? That would be quite an extension cord.
4. The worker’s right to a secret ballot is something I can agree with. I don’t understand how anyone can think that there is more pressure at the ballot box. I’ve been involved in a number of organizing campaigns, and the hard part is collecting the cards with people’s signatures on them to be turned in to the employer. After that, balloting is pretty much of a breeze.
5. Support for legal immigration is not all bad either. After the massive amnesty of the Reagan administration, the new Americans demanded a living wage that agro-business was unwilling to pay, so they imported a whole new group of illegals to work the field for slave wages, inadequate housing, and social services provided by the local property owners. I don’t pretend to have all of the answers to this, but enforcement must start with the employers, or the cycle will repeat ad infinitum.
6. Victory in Iraq and Afghanistan has a real ring to it. 30,000 troops (at $30B/year – yes, $1B/soldier/year) is not the answer. Probably the only real answer would be to reinstitute the draft, send 500,000 troops over, and damn the damage to the oil fields. ‘Nuff said, not gonna happen. The Repubs could care less about our kids (theirs aren’t going), but the oil fields are quite another matter.
7. Containment of North Korea and Iran, and elimination of their nuclear threat. Sounds good, fellows, what do you have in mind?
8. Defense of Marriage Act. Please, please explain to me how a gay couple marrying in Vermont will mess up your happy home in Alabama. I’m having some real trouble figuring this one out.
9. Opposition to health care rationing, denial of health care, and federal funding of abortions. Excellent choice – do you plan to tell the insurance companies to stop rationing and denying, because that would be one helluva start. Of course, that would significantly decrease your funding………
10. Support for the Second Amendment. Okay, the Second Amendment clearly states that citizens are permitted to bear arms in order to maintain a militia. I cannot find a thing in this amendment that guarantees your God-given right to own a fully automatic weapon, a cannon (unless you are a historic re-enactor, what the hell do you plan to do with it?), a Sherman tank or a rocket launcher (not covered by the “red glare”).
This is an open thread.
I am rarely commenting and just reading all my fave blogs. I think the main reason is that I have an “oh to hell with them all” attitude. In most instances, I can no longer tell a Dem from a Rep, and that scares me.
Anyway, great post.
The majority of the items on their list include the word “oppose” or “opposition”. They could simplify things by saying they oppose any measure, even if it benefits our citizens and makes our country stronger, if it’s initiated by anyone other than themselves.
Jsnicen – I noticed that too. Just as John Dean writes in “Conservatives without Conscience,” today’s conservatism is pretty much a big, petulant “NO.”
More like “Ten Reasons to NOT expect any kind of remotely competent oversight during the Obama years”.
I’m so over both parties…….. Tequila, anyone?
In regard to #1 of the Repub list:
Ask them point blank: Okay, what do you want to cut? Name the programs. It won’t be much because as was said, they had the reins for 8 years and didn’t do shit about budgets, deficits or anything of the like. They’ll have a hard time naming things cuz their constituents like “stuff” just like Dem constituents do, except the Repub ones don’t want to pay for any of it.
Not so good. Have a friend who’s a retired nurse who came over. She listened to her lungs w/out a stethoscope and said she could hear the rattles in the upper left lobe. So it could be bronchitis or maybe lobar pneu. ?? Called the doc’s office, nothing for an appt tomorrow, but had Wed. I said I didn’t want to get her out in the wind, cold and rain Wed. that we’re gonna have. The next avail appt. was Thursday @ 10:30.
There’s also an urgent care place in the same facility that I might take her to tomorrow if she’ll agree. I asked the woman at the main # to have the doc’s nurse call me. She’s on her last Cipro and I’m afraid to d/c that, wait a few days and then see the doc. I’m afraid about not having antibiotics in her system for a couple of days. So I’m waiting to see what the nurse says.
BTW: did you see my last comment on previous thread about what came up for my Amazon recommendations?
@11:
I’m staying in the Democratic Party – whether they want me or not – and will continue to fight for the ideals I believe in. To me, a legitimate 3rd party is just not possible because of the amount of money it would take to be competitive. And I don’t want a “Bloomberg Party” or a “Buffett Party”, thank you very much.
chat@17: The urgent care place is in the same bldg so they can get x-rays from same imaging group and may have to do that.
mb@13: but they never cut those things when they had the #s in Congress to do that.
and for both: Hush! You’re making me blush!
And I’ll be honest with you both…it gets tiring; no way to get around that.
Forgot about the S-chip thing and they never did fund NCLB correctly. Oops I forgot!
@23. Well it was probably the old truism: It doesn’t affect me, so what’s the deal?
Not that I mean it cynically but those things didn’t have an impact on me.
Bad Fred!
Fredster, you are a wonderful son, and one helluva human being, so no need to be shy, although your blush is very attractive. Take care of yourself!
Being a furriner, I don’t have a right to be critical, but Janicen is spot on. That platform is more against something, than it is a policy statement for positive improvement. Although our Conservative party is more akin to your DINOs, they are attempting to import the same behaviours. The smear ads (which really tick off more Canadians than they know), the misdirections, the policy of being against rather than for something positive. Sigh. I hope it stops there, cause by and large, we Canucks are generally a tolerant people. You have a full blown systemic infection – we have the cooties.
About a year ago, I was watching a broadcast of the Republican party platform planning on C-span. I don’t remember how long I watched, but I recall that almost every issue was related in some way to embryos or fetuses. The one exception was their discussion of a measure to from an affirmative action program to favor right-wingers in higher learning institutions. This would be needed, of course, to balance out all of the liberal propaganda currently preached and practiced therein. It was about that time I turned off the TV.
I agree with EOF, I am becoming wary of seeing continuous references to middle class from Dems. I’d like to see more focus on the working class and poor. They are the ones really struggling. Nothing against the middle class.
Exactly. To some point, I like to know what the opposition is thinking, so I try to be willing to listen to that stuff. But then, it just gets predictable anyway. It’s like, I’m not learning anything new, so, time to take a nap.
Right Madamab. The poor and working class/working poor are not worthy of being mentioned by Obama and the Dems. They have made a big effort to call themselves the party of the middle class. They have apparently calculated that this would be damaging to their image, due to the demonization of the poor you just spoke about. They also, like the rest of the powers that be, continue an effort to conceal the fact that the middle class barely even exists anymore, and would rather continue to obscure this and attempt to fool us into thinking otherwise.
True, Aspen. Soon enough we will return to the Gilded Age, with an upper class and an underclass. Between Bush and Obama, we have obliterated the middle class but good.
One of the pundits said that there has not been this much disparity of income since the ’20s.
I can think of a number of adjectives that surpass “amazing”. Let’s see: horrifying, disgusting, gut-wrenching, stupifying and deplorable, to name only a few.
In my town, McMansions continue to be built and there is a ready market for them.
At the same time, we have an unprecedented need for homeless shelters and free food from community kitchens and food banks here.
Obama and his Ivy League / Wall Street friends couldn’t care less about the “great unwashed”. The media turns a blind eye to them as well.
Disgraceful.
@ 33
Don’t forget, Republican “small government” also includes governmental control over a woman’s reproductive organs.
Congrats, Fredster. The Saints looked terrific tonight.
Off the serious topics but can’t help it!! Hee-hee! Tom Brady we creamed yo Yankee Ass and the rest of the Patriots!! 8)
Ah Chat ya beat me to it! Nothing finer than to see Brady and Belichick withose looks of shock and dismay on their faces. Ya know…this just doesn’t happen to the Patriots! (except it has 4 times this year! )
Comments are closed.
November 30, 2009 at 8:31 AM
I’ll try to be economic with words:
Support for the original democratic platform (civil rights, job creation, democracy) – and please leave out the “middle class” references as mostly obsolete and exclusionary of the present base.
And no war.