Posted by: madamab on: January 12, 2010
Okay, maybe I’m snarking just a tad. After all, no one could have predicted that an enormously popular Republican ex-Governor would end up as a pundit on Fox News. It’s not as though it’s ever happened before! Yes, get ready, America – it’s Sarah Palin, on the teevee!
Former Gov. Sarah Palin of Alaska has signed on as a contributor to the Fox News Channel. The network confirmed that Ms. Palin would appear on the network’s programming on a regular basis as part of a multiyear deal. Financial terms were not disclosed.
Ms. Palin will not have her own regular program, one person with knowledge of the deal said, though she will host a series that will run on the network from time to time…
(snip)
Many suspected that when Ms. Palin retired as the governor of Alaska last summer she was doing so to pursue some sort of career in television. The Fox News deal, however, would not seem to be all-encompassing, and would appear to give her room for other pursuits, as well.
The deal was formally announced on Monday afternoon. Robert Barnett, Ms. Palin’s lawyer, did not respond to a call for comment. “I am thrilled to be joining the great talent and management team at Fox News. It’s wonderful to be part of a place that so values fair and balanced news,” Ms. Palin said in a statement.
My gawd, this woman is a natural for television; she’s a sound-byte generating machine. Just think, in two measly sentences she managed to perfectly work in the Fox News Network’s famous slogan!
I always thought she’d be a perfect co-host for her fellow former Republican Governor and fundiegelical teevee host, Mike Huckabee. Maybe she’ll get there after a few months. We know she’s a quick learner, don’t we?
I just hope all those “PUMAs for Palin” aren’t totally heart-broken that she isn’t, after all, running for President. As far as I know, running for President while appearing as a television pundit would violate the law; for example, Fred Thompson quit Law & Order before deciding to run (okay, hobble) for President in 2008, and that wasn’t even a political show.
As for me, I wish Palin all the best. I certainly won’t be watching. I’ve had enough Republican soundbytes from both parties to last a lifetime.
In other news, Massachussetts Senatorial hopeful Martha Coakley, after reversing her stance on the Health Whatever bill in order to curry favor with the National Party, has officially been thrown under the bus, Both Ways Barack style.
President Obama has no plans to travel to Massachusetts to campaign for Democrat Martha Coakley in the home stretch in the special election to fill the US Senate seat held by the late Edward M. Kennedy.
Presidential press secretary Robert Gibbs said today in response to a question at a briefing in the White House that the “president doesn’t have any travel plans to campaign in Massachusetts,” because “it’s not on our schedule to go to next week.”
Coakley represents the critical 60th vote that Democrats need to pass the president’s health care overhaul. Coakley’s opponents — Republican Scott Brown and independent Joseph L. Kennedy — have both said they would vote to block the health care bill.
The president did, however, send an email to supporters today imporing [sic] them to help push Coakley over the top.
“We all need Ted Kennedy’s seat to be filled by a champion for change — and Martha Coakley is that champion,” Obama wrote in the message.
“The stakes are high. Time is short,” he added. “And your role is essential.”
L.O. Freaking. L. Is he kidding?
Let’s see if I’ve got this right.
If Martha Coakley doesn’t win this seat, the Health Whatever monstrosity will have to face a Republican filibuster. Gadzooks! A filibuster supposedly makes the bill impossible to pass according to the “60 votes needed” framing, which as we all know is bullshit – there’s no way the Repubs could filibuster forever, is there – but that’s what the Democrats and the media have all been saying for years. Given those circumstances, you’d think this extremely critical election would warrant a visit from the head of the Party, our President, Barack Obama, wouldn’t you? Isn’t health “insurance” reform the jewel in his crown? Isn’t this what all the Democrats are going to campaign on in 2012? Isn’t this supposed to be the change we could all believe in, timed to pass at Christmas, like St. Nick’s biggest and best present to America?
Alas, such an effort would require Obama to take some sort of a stance, to exert himself, to show a little initiative, a little energy. He doesn’t do that. That’s YOUR job, Obama fans. You do the work; he golfs, vacations and takes the credit. Remember?
Obama highlighted health care, the economy, and financial services reform as reasons to support the attorney general in next week’s election.
“We’re so close to passing health reform — finally realizing Senator Kennedy’s life’s work,” Obama wrote. “But we cannot get the job done without Martha Coakley in the Senate. And that means it may well all come down to you.”
Get it now? If she doesn’t get elected, it’s all your fault. As for him, campaigning for Coakley…isn’t on the schedule. That’s Robert Gibbs’ story, and he’s sticking to it.
QUESTION: On politics, there are indications that Massachusetts Senate race is tightening up. The DNC sent a top staffer there today. Does the president have any intention of going up to Massachusetts to campaign on behalf of Martha Coakley?
GIBBS: The president doesn’t have any travel plans to campaign in Massachusetts.
QUESTION: Robert, why isn’t the president going to campaign for Martha Coakley? It’s a tight race, very important to (inaudible) essentially?
GIBBS: It’s not on our schedule to go to next week.
QUESTION: And why is it not on the schedule?
GIBBS: It’s just not on the schedule.
The press can’t believe what it’s hearing, so the “reporters” try to get more details any way they can.
QUESTION: Is he — is he concerned — is there concern that his popularity — I mean, it just doesn’t make any sense that he wouldn’t go up there (emphasis mine). Is he concerned that his popularity ratings…
GIBBS: Not that I’m aware of.
QUESTION: … if he goes up there, that he might hurt her campaign?
GIBBS: No. No. No.
QUESTION: So just — just not on the schedule. It seems the scheduler actually who has decided not to send him.
GIBBS: All I can say was, you didn’t ask me that. We just — it’s not on the schedule as a trip the president’s going to make.
Well, all righty then. This here Health Whatever kabuki just got a lot more interesting, didn’t it?
This is an open thread.
The Boston Globe poll has Coakley up by 17 points! That is quite a discrepancy among polls.
I bet Obama will wind up going to campaign for her. He probably just has to make room on his agenda. Playing hoops, eating waffles, spending quality time with the teleprompter, etc., keeps a Prez real busy.
NEWSFLASH! Barry won’t be going to MA but has assured Martha of his committment with this serenade:
Considering how unpopular Obama has become, maybe he thinks it’s better if he stays away from Coakley. After all, he came to NJ several times to campaign with Corzine, and that didn’t turn out too well.
It’s wonderful to be part of a place that so values fair and balanced news,” Ms. Palin said in a statement.
Bwaa-Haa_Haa!! Oh stop Sarah…Your killing me! “FAIR AND BALANCED?”
ROFLMAO…..That was the best joke I’ve heard this month.
What a wonderful post and thread today, so informative — thanks all for catching me up so much, including the hilarious transcript of Gibbs’ presser. What a hoot.
I have been reading a bit about the Coakley race and the polls all over the place, but now the WH presser tells me that she is in trouble. I bet That’s why the Big O is not going to Boston, so her loss cannot be blamed on him.
In this as in so much, Obama’s dispassionate stance, his distancing from the real work of the presidency and party leadership, is just something to watch, isn’t it? Hmmm, did Harry Reid and Chuck “two-by-four to Hillary” Schumer check Obama’s resume to see how long he stuck with and fought for anything before? No.
DYB: There was a time when the Teamsters went for Nixon in the Prez elections. Granted that was when Hoffa was in charge, many moons ago and probably before you were born. However, many union groups took increases in benefits as opposed to getting increases in wages. They aren’t going to look too happily at those benefits now being taxes as “Cadillac” plans.
Isn’t official union support really about money rather than votes? The unions may just decide not to contribute to Democrats who vote for this “Health Whatever” bill.
Beata@23: well they used to be able to turn out the votes. When they had a lot more power the union presidents could say who they would endorse and could count on a pretty good turnout from the rank and file to vote the way the union said. These days, I don’t think it’s so much that way.
I remember during the primaries that when the SEIU endorsed Obama, it was considered a giant coup, not in terms of money, but in terms of votes.
Chat, since you are a member, is that the way you recall it?
I’m here on the ground in the People’s Republic of Massachusetts and I don’t think Martha’s in any real trouble. It wouldn’t surprise me at all if that latest Globe poll that has her ahead by 17 points is right on the money. It will all depend on turnout, though–which, despite all the national publicity about the race lately, is likely to be low. Special election in January in New England usually means a low turnout, and since registered Democrats outnumber registered Republicans by 3 to 1 in this state, a low turnout brings out only the die-hard partisans and hence always favors the Democrat.
And please, Mr. President, stay away!! Who needs you when we got the Big Dawg coming to campaign for Martha on the 15th!! Funny, isn’t it, how the Dem establishment hates the Clintons until they’re needed to help a candidate in trouble?
I’m mad at Martha for her flip-flop on the health insurance reform bill, but I’m still gonna vote for her.
When they thought Martha was in trouble the “money” forces started rolling in to her assistance.
I got this from another blog, but here’s the help that’s arriving. She’ll be so in debt to these folks she’ll never get out from under their thumb:
We’ve been following the special election in Massachusetts, where the GOP hopes to pull a surprise upset in the race to fill Ted Kennedy’s seat.
If they do pull it off, healthcare reform is instantly in trouble, as the Democrats drop below 60.
But money is coming to the rescue of Democrat Martha Coakley — healthcare industry lobbyist money, specifically.
Tim Carney identifies several of her top fundraisers. Take a look at who they represent:
Thomas Boggs, Patton Boggs: Bristol-Myers Squibb
Chuck Brain, Capitol Hill Strategies: Amgen, BIO, Merck, PhRMA
Susan Brophy, Glover Park Group: Blue Cross, Pfizer
Steven Champlin, Duberstein Group: AHIP, Novartis, Sanofi-Aventis
Licy Do Canto, Raben Group: Amgen
Gerald Cassidy, Cassidy & Associates: U. Mass Memorial Health Care
David Castagnetti, Mehlman, Vogel, Castagnetti: Abbot Labs, AHIP, Astra-Zenaca, General Electric, Humana, Merck, PhRMA.
Steven Elmendorf, Elmendorf Strategies: Medicines Company, PhRMA, United Health
Shannon Finley, Capitol Counsel: Amgen, Astra-Zeneca, Blue Cross, GE, PhRMA, Sanofi-Aventis.
Heather Podesta, Heather Podesta & Partners: Cigna, Eli Lilly, HealthSouth
Tony Podesta, Podesta Group: Amgen, GE, Merck, Novartis.
Robert Raben, Raben Group: Amgen, GE.
Health insurance companies and Pharma? They’ll have a strangle-hold on her.
Well hell…my blockquote didn’t work.
I very closely followed the primaries, including the SEIU role — and yes, it was considered crucial. It figured hugely in that mess of a caucus state. Nevada, as I recall — remember the casino caucuses? casinos that give the SEIU lots of members and influence there? and the corruption of those caucuses? Of course, now we know so much more about Reid’s role there, too, and can suspect it in in the unconscionable attacks on the Clintons in that state as well, while Harry was claiming to be above it all.
Fredster @24: That was my impression. The rank and file seem less likely to vote the way the union hierarchy wants them to these days.
I would be interested in Chat’s opinion as a union member.
Fredster @27: That is so depressing.
AP Sources: Obama likes national health exchange (well whoop-t-doo!)
WASHINGTON – President Barack Obama has indicated support for a national clearinghouse where consumers could shop for health coverage and an end to the decades-old antitrust exemption enjoyed by insurance companies, Democratic officials said Tuesday.
In signaling his preferences, Obama is siding with House Democrats over their Senate counterparts on issues crucial to negotiations on his health care overhaul.
House Democrats are pressing for both provisions to be included in the final measure, now that their proposal for a government-run insurance option appears dead due to opposition from key Senate moderates. Obama has sided with the Senate to support a new tax on high-value insurance plans opposed in the House.
Obama met with House Democratic leaders last week as they sought support from the president on other priorities. He is now indicating support for creation of a national exchange rather than the state-based structure in the Senate bill, and for revoking the antitrust exemption, which the Senate bill does not do, the officials said.
Rest of article here:
DYB@41: I’m convinced that whatever they throw together, we all lose. It will be a disaster.
Chat: I saw that and thought it was so weird to have an earthquake in that area. Sadly, Haiti is the cesspool of the Western Hemisphere, they are so dirt poor there and live in shacks. It’s terrible.
Do I undeerstand this right? Employers may not be required to provide health insurance for their employees…Does that mean that anyone who has employer sponsored insurance may get dumped into the pool as soon as employers are relieved of their responsibility? Or as soon as their contracts run out?
Plainjane @44: God only knows what anything in this POS bill means! If and when it passes ( and I think it’s going to pass ), it will probably be years before we know what is really in it and what the ramifications are.
PJ@44: As they say, “contact your representative or senator”.
DYB:
“House and Senate negotiators working on President Barack Obama’s health overhaul bill appear likely to drop a proposed income tax increase on high-wage earners and possibly jettison a requirement for large businesses to offer coverage to their employees, Democratic officials said Tuesday.”
Those were both the provisions in the House bill that had some remotely positive effects. Nancy “We Won’t Roll Over” Pelosi is giving away the store.
I think all of us here expected very little good to come from the Obama administration, but did you really think that a Democratic-controlled Congress would fail us so utterly and completely, especially on health care?
I guess I am naive but I had some faith in people like Russ Feingold, Sherrod Brown, and Bernie Sanders. I was hoping for good things from Al Franken as well, when he was finally sworn in. They have all caved. And no one who is on our side in the House seems to have any power.
I am so disheartened.
Go Colts!!!
I notice that AP is now referring to the “Health Whatever” bill as “health overhaul”. It reeks of something involving manure.
Maybe tomorrow it will finally get above freezing here and melt some of our snow.
Nightie-nite, all.
( Madamab, it is Gene Tierney. I loved her in “Laura”. )
Comments are closed.
January 12, 2010 at 8:52 AM
I’ve seen polls that have her ahead by 9 points, and another that has her down by one.
Sadly neither the WH nor the Kennedys are rendering anything other than lip service.