The Widdershins

Morning Widdershins: An Open Letter to Pam Tebow

Posted by: chatblu on: January 30, 2010

How About You Focus On Your Own Family?

How About You Focus On Your Own Family?

Dear Mrs. Tebow,

Like millions of other college footballistas, I have watched your son develop into one of the game’s most memorable players. His heart, talent, personal ethics, and ability to run are  like those of Georgia’s own Herschel Walker, and that’s saying something. (Yes, yes. I know he broke Herschel’s rushing touchdown record, but he took four years as opposed to Herschel’s three.) Your maternal pride in this fine young man is justifiable, but I must say that utilizing him to further your religious convictions is anything but.

Your family is deeply religious, and appears to live their beliefs. In and of itself this is absolutely laudable, but your rights and beliefs end right at the point where mine begin. As a mother, I can only imagine your agonizing decision to carry Tim to term despite medical advice to the contrary. Many would have chosen differently so as not to leave four motherless children behind, but your choice is personal and that is precisely as it should be. That said, your personal choice should be kept en famille rather than being a highlight of the bloody Super Bowl. Most people have long since made up their minds in this regard, and I assure you that no 30-second spot during THE football game of the year will have the impact for which you so hunger. I have watched the Super Bowl commercials for many years, and have yet to purchase Gillette shaving cream, Budweiser beer, or the services of e-Trade. I can also assure you that this really isn’t personal – I don’t want to spend Super Bowl Sunday pondering capital punishment, bigamy, or any other burning moral/ethical issue about which I have already made up my mind. I want to watch the damned game and be entertained, not lectured by the commercials, and I couldn’t possibly care any less about Sarah Palin’s support of your venture even if I tried.

As far as Tim goes, he has a bright future ahead. If he’s able to fix that funky throw, he’ll be a tremendous asset both on and off of the gridiron. Any team that drafts him will sleep soundly with no worries of DUI’s, bar fights, domestic violence or any of the other personnel plagues of the NFL. I just don’t want him, or any other male for that matter, advising me how to manage my reproductive system. Personally, I believe that his time might be better spent by imploring the “deadbeat dads” of America to be the kind of man that both he and his father exemplify – but I’ll bet you dollars to doughnuts that this type of public service/morality message will never air during the Super Bowl despite the fact that every struggling single mother in America would throw in a few bucks to make it happen.

CBS spokesperson Dana McClintock advised the AP that, despite the long-standing policy of eschewing this type of commercials during major sporting events, “we have for some time moderated our approach to advocacy ads after it became apparent that our stance did not reflect public sentiment or industry norms.” He then stated that CBS “will consider responsibly produced ads from all for the few remaining spots in Super Bowl XLIV”. I have a few suggestions, Dana. How about messages from MADD and the American Heart Association? Follow it up with ads about children lost in the foster system for 15 years because no one will adopt them. That should do it. Your audience can then feel guilty about their snacks, drinks and homes and a ripping good time will be had by all.

Terry O’Neill has stated that “The goal of Focus on the Family ad is not to empower women. It’s to create a climate in which Roe v. Wade can be overturned. ……….. NOW respects every woman’s right to plan her own family and insists that our laws do the same.”

I join Terry O’Neill in her sentiments, and add that CBS should respect my feelings, my privacy, and mind their own damned business.

Before I close, Mrs. Tebow, just one little suggestion: perhaps Tim should place all but about $40,000/year (about the average family income in Florida) into a fund so that unwanted foster children awaiting adoption will be able to go to school and further their lives. That would be the embodiment of pro-life values.

This is an open thread.

Advertisement

63 Responses to "Morning Widdershins: An Open Letter to Pam Tebow"

Reacting to an ad before it is even aired will only draw more attention to it.

Time might be better spent teaching our girls and women not to hero worship; not to be slaves to movie and sports stars. Surely we can admire what these people accomplish without surrendering our minds.

I have worked for reproductive rights for years but no more. All our struggles were worth it and not begruged, but now it appears that women have not evolved enough to continue their battle for their rights if they are influenced by a hunk of testosterone.

And it is difficult to think that the male and female electorate will be swayed by this ad since most of the viewers go out to the kitchen for refreshments during commercials and never see it. And most of the others will be so smashed they won’t even remember it.

Thanks for your perspective, Twandx, but your disagreement proves my points: this ad has no place at the Super Bowl, and most people have already formed an opinion on the matter, Further, SB commercials are generally excellent. I have a few friends who really don’t like football and watch the game for the commercials.

Chat: Has the Super Bowl broadcast ever allowed a commercial dealing with controversial social issues before? I don’t think so. Then why is this one being aired? I don’t understand it.

So more boobs are going to be exposed this SuperBowl? Hmmm, I’ll boycott (not exactly a hardship for me)

@3: No, they haven’t, and I dispute Dana McClintock’s posture regarding “industry norms”. I’ve never seen this type of ad during major sporting events before.

@4: LOL!

If NOW and the other pro-choice women’s organizations had any sense, they’d put their own damn ad up during the SuperBowl.

“Dear anti-choicers: Mind your own damn business.”

Hear, hear. But, I’ll bet that none of those remaining spots would be available to NOW.

Super Bowl commercials cost big bucks. I bet NOW doesn’t have the $$$ that Focus on the Family does. A pity.

Exactly, ladies, but I’ll bet if they did a fundraiser for just that purpose and joined forces with other groups, the money would be there.

They just don’t ever fight hard enough. It’s a slap in the face to the feminists who fought for decades for Roe v. Wade. I can understand twandx’ frustration, although I don’t share her way of dealing with it.

Why don’t liberal women work better together? It seems that conservative women do.

Just asking….

I don’t know, Beata. I sure wish we did. Lefties seem more picky somehow.

To say that it was inappropriate of CBS to accept this ad is an understatement. Who decided – and what criteria did they use – that this ad for this organization was ok? If this is acceptable, then why not a recruiting ad for the KKK? And the lack of action on the part of NOW and other pro-women organizations is, sadly, not surprising. They’re all just phoning it in and have been for ages. I agree with MB that if they wanted to put up an ad to counter the pro-overpopulated-abandoned-neglected-children-once-they’re-born-we-don’t-give-a-shit-about-them lobby they would have found the money. But, as Mrs. Slocum used to say on Are You Being Served?: “Weak as water, weak as water.”

I had read/seen that the cost of the commercials for the S.B. were going down, i.e. ad revenue was off for the event. Supposedly this commercial cost $2 mill.

Gloria Allred thinks the ad may be misleading:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/01/29/tim-tebow-super-bowl-ad-m_n_442808.html

my comment at 117 p.m. is in moderation

You’re out. I read your link, and while I do not always agree with Gloria Allred, her suit would be rather interesting.

Although not terribly germane to the issue I think the kid (tebow) is being manipulated in this situation.

One thing that professional sports doesn’t like is controversy (see leBron James and gun). From some things I’ve read Tebow has some things going against him to get into the pros. If he starts a controversy regarding being in this commercial he may only hurt his own chances of getting into the NFL.

Why is it that FL quarterbacks don’t seem to do well in the NFL? I’m thinking Wurfel (sp?) and another wunderkin who was at FL whose name I forget right now.

chat: thanks. I don’t know if what she says about the Philippines and abortion is true or not but yes it would be interesting to see it filed.

Chat: what the hell is up with Charlie and this?

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100130/ap_on_re_us/us_medical_airlift_haiti

Ugh, I hate Allred, but this suit is kind of interesting.

Apparently the Tebow fans aren’t too happy with this commercial idea either:

http://www.alligatorarmy.com/2010/1/19/1258224/tebow-his-commercial-and-the-nfl

Hmm…CBS rejected ads from liberal groups like MoveOn and PETA a few years ago? (This is according to the alligatorarmy article Fredster linked to.)

@17: system quarterbacks have problems in the NFL because they have never taken direct snaps from the center. The other wunderkind was Rex Grossman. Look also at Alex Smith from Utah.
@18: Jackson Memorial is funded by property taxes and they are in dire straits. Apparently the administrator traveled to Tallahasse last week and told Crist that the hospital could not absorb any more without state help, and the state has no help to give. The patients that JMH currently has need care projected into the multi-millions, and God knows where that money will come from. Now the ball is in the feds’ court. What a horrible mess.

chat-thanks for the info. Grossman was the other I was thinking of. They do great in college but aren’t “versatile” (?) enough for the pros?

re-the injured Haitians and Jackson Memorial. You’re right, that is a mess.

Hitler is crushed by the iPad.

@25 is funny.

There is nothing in that gay dating site ad that’s offensive. (@26) You don’t even see those two guys kissing. Frankly, it IS discrimination on CBS’s part. Assholes.

What movie did that scene come from? Everyone has had a field day with doing these little things but now I’m curious about the original movie.

DYB@29: It’s actually humorous in an SNL kinda way.

Fredster> It’s a great film, made a few years back. It’s called “Das Untergan” (The Downfall) and that’s Bruno Granz as Hitler. It’s told from his secretary’s point of view and covers the last couple of weeks of Hitler and friends in the bunker. It’s based on his secretary’s autobiography (there was also a documentary made about her and “The Downfall” includes a few excerpts from the interviews in the documentary). I found everyone’s relationship to Hitler in the film truly fascinating; just how loyal on a purely human level they were to him. It didn’t even seem to be ideology – he could have been selling tomatoes for all they cared. They were loyal to him as a person. Very strange…

@32: I wonder if they have it with subtitles?

The movie is available from Netflix (with English subtitles.) That’s how I saw it!

@34: Thanks!! I would really like to see it now that I have some background on it.

Tried checking to see if blockbuster had it-they did, but no blockbuster in immediate area. I may just buy the damned thing off of Amazon.

All – Credo Action has a petition they’re going to deliver to CBS. They’re making the point that you’re all making – liberal advocacy bad, conservative advocacy good at CBS. It is a good petition, I think.

Click here to sign the petition.

P.S. I’m told Tebow is not mobile enough and/or does not have a good enough arm to succeed in the NFL.

But I think that in terms of NFL controversy, this is probably pretty small potatoes. After all, Ray Lewis was suspected of murder and is still playing for the Ravens. Michael Vick was jailed for torturing and killing dogs, and he’s been hired by the Eagles. Being in a so-called “family values” ad seems pretty tame by comparison.

MB@38: Eh, you could be right and most probably are.

I signed it.

Cool, Fredster! They seem to be doing well with the number of signatures they’re getting. They are a pretty good organization, not too Kool-Aid drenched.

Can you believe, I had to go into the office today? (I’m a contractor, so it’s pretty unusual for me to be asked to do that.) I am the only person in our NY office who actually lives in NY, and one of the servers had to be restarted by pushing the power button. Now am off to date night with hubby. Later all!

MB@41: LOL! I believe it. If you’ve got a good contract, do you get travel time and a standard min. amt. for having to go in for a call?

Enjoy your evening, Mad. I’m saying farewell to college football by watching the Senior Bowl.(Snurfle.)

What network is it on?

Aw shit!! I just saw it’s on the NFL Network. :evil:

Fredster> I think “The Downfall” is definitely worth seeking out. A friend of mine has seen it almost a dozen times. I wouldn’t go that far, but it’s a really fascinating look at Hitler’s last days from the perspective of a very young woman who really admired him – at least at the time. In the interview excerpt they play at the end of the film she describes the moment she understood the madness of what had taken place. Also, in the updates at the end of the film it’s interesting to see how many people from Hitler’s bunker lived very long lives.

Michael Vick not only got rehired to the NFL, he got an award from his team for “overcoming adversity.” Sick people, all of them.

DYB: I think it was something like $9.00 or so on amazon so I may buy it.

Brrrrr…it’s 33 here with a wind chill in the 20s. Looks like tonight is Papa Johns $10.00 pizza night.

Have a slice for me, Fred.

While we are all Ga Ga over Pam Tebow, we should also thank Eunice Durden for giving birth to another Heisman Trophy winner, as you mentioned. This mother made home-made braces for his rickets that he wore till age five. O.J. Simpson is currently serving his nine year sentence at the Lovelock Correctional Center in Lovelock Nevada. Most Mothers are Great!

While we are all Ga Ga over Pam Tebow, we should also thank Eunice Durden for giving birth to another Heisman Trophy winner, as you mentioned.

Uh no. No one mentioned O.J.

Sorry.

Re #32. ” loyal to him as a person “, regardless of ideology. Hmmmmm…. Now where have we seen that recently? Not so strange.

Just cruisin’ around the blogs (sigh-no other cruising for me :-( and I ran across this piece which is hysterical and shows the idiocy of trying to work with the repugs.

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2010_01/022152.php

That’s a great article, Fredster.

Chat, I think this part just summed it up:

Just a few years ago, a handful of Senate Republicans — Olympia Snowe, Susan Collins, George Voinovich, and John McCain — argued that paygo should be brought back. They were unsuccessful in persuading their Republican colleagues at the time, and yesterday, they voted with their Republican colleagues to reject the idea that they’d already embraced.

Saying no just to say no.

Now I’m not sure how good an idea I think it is right now, but as we get out of recession (if?) it needs to be looked at. As the article stated, paygo was in effect when Clinton was in and made it possible to stop deficit spending.

Should be interesting, to say the least.

@56: That’s actually hilarious! Republicans voted Nay on all options. Fantastic!

DYB@56: You’d think that would be right up their alley, being fiscally conservative and all but nope, not gonna happen!

Well, I guess all’s right with the world and there’s nothing to worry about if he has time for this:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_obama_basketball

Well, I always said I would watch Meryl Streep read the phone book, and I think I just did.

“It’s Complicated”: Should have been called, “The Hollywood Wife’s Revenge Fantasy, Minus the Revenge Part.”

Debra Messing & Co. did it so much better.

So, no Mamma Mia, huh?

Definitely not, Fredster! La Streep was fabulous, but the material was not. The script was sloppy (what happened to her neurosis about her left eyelid?) and all the depth and edges were smoothed out of everyone’s personality. Even Alec Baldwin wasn’t that funny. And the kids, why were they there? They seemed like they had all taken Valium or were aliens or something. What young kids of divorced parents are that well-adjusted with no anger whatsoever? And not a speck of fat or a stray hair out of place. The drama, it was simply not there.

B- at best.

Night all!

Comments are closed.

Next Empty Plates Protest in NYC: March TBD

Message: Tax cuts for the wealthy starve the rest of us. Jobs, Not Tax Cuts!

L 2012 – Support Your Local Lefties!

Blog Archive

Activism: Haiti

Activism: The Environment

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.