The Widdershins

Feminist Friday: This Too Shall Pass?

Posted by: madamab on: February 26, 2010

We're Melting

We're Melting

I am now going to say something odd: The actions of government actually matter to the citizens of that government’s country.

This is an odd thing to say these days, because our media culture seems to feel otherwise. The talking heads, instead of talking about policy, harp on alleged “winners and losers,” as if we’re all playing some amusing game together, or drone on endlessly about some mythical creature called “bipartisanship,” as if anything the Republicans proposed would be reasonable rather than actively harmful to the vast majority of Americans. Do we really need MORE evidence, after eight years of Bush, that Republican ideology is bad for America? Why must we pretend otherwise, over and over, ad nauseum, ad infinitum? And you certainly wouldn’t know it from the way Obama and Congress do nothing but try to score political points off of each other, rather than pass legislation that might actually help their constituents.

But every time our leadership lets us down by refusing to move society forward into a more peaceful, just and socially enlightened place, people lose their jobs, their homes and their lives.

I can’t believe that “liberal” people defending the Democrats or “conservative” people defending the Republicans still don’t understand this. Maybe something has to happen to them personally before they get it. Maybe they have to lose their jobs and not get them back; have a family member get sick and go bankrupt because of it; drive 50 miles to get emergency birth control, be denied, and get pregnant with a baby they can’t raise, then die in childbirth or have their child die, or both; have a family member or a friend join the National Guard or the Reserves, only to get killed in Iraq or Afghanistan or Pakistan or Yemen or wherever the hell we’re currently at war.

I am not wishing these horrors on anyone: I don’t have to.

They’re already happening.

What will it take before people finally stand in the street and scream ENOUGH! ENOUGH! The whole fucking building is burning down, and our government is standing outside at a safe distance, carrying thimbles of water and debating over whether or not to use them! Use them or don’t use them; they are worthless! We need firehoses and bucket brigades and helicopters dumping fire extinguisher on the roaring flames!

How dare they. How dare they do this to us?!

Our country is morally bankrupt enough to natter on about “risk pools” and “Cadillac plans” instead of recognizing that health care is a human right and that no one deserves to die because they can’t afford it. We are killing our own people and the world’s people by the millions through warfare, both class and military in nature. We are doing nothing about climate change or moving towards sustainable energy; the latest global energy summit in Copenhagen was as pointless and unproductive as yesterday’s Health Whatever summit.

I can’t help wondering: Can we even survive the next three years of Obama? Or the next seven years? Or if he is a one-term President, can we survive whomever succeeds him?

And then, when I get too upset and angry, my husband reminds me that he felt the same way…in 1970. And here we still are, clinging on by our fingernails.

This too shall pass, indeed. But how? Our Republic is so young compared to the democracies of Europe and the Netherlands. They have seen so much of this before, and have somehow overcome it and found themselves again. Will we find the wherewithal to pull ourselves up by our bootstraps, with that famous American ingenuity, and somehow force our corrupt, bought and uninterested oligarchy/patriarchy to make real, effective change? Or will we follow other Republics and descend into fascism, the way Italy and Germany did in the first half of the twentieth century?

I don’t know what will happen. I do know that I am stunned and reeling from the sheer awfulness of what happens in politics every day. (They call it “The Shock Doctrine” for a reason.) That’s why I write about things we can do, some little, some big, that may jostle something or someone, have a butterfly effect that is infinitely greater than its actual intent. And I do try to posit solutions that have either worked in the past, or bring up ideas that may be new and controversial; something, anything that might help the desperate situation we are all in. We are all living hand to mouth in this country. The slightest thing can bring us down. We may not realize it, but that is the Goddess’ honest truth.

If we want to go in the direction of positive, not negative, change, I believe that we have to keep having these discussions. We must get beyond the narrow framework of our stagnant political discourse. No, Obama is not a socialist, and no, tax cuts are not the answer to everything, and no, for the last time, we don’t need a “public option.”  We must think outside the box; hell, we have to walk outside the box and around the box, and see what it’s made of, and then decide if we want that box to be a table instead, or a rose, or a kumquat.

Let’s all do whatever we can to ensure that our current hell will pass away, and a new era of social consciousness, peace and justice will arise from the ashes.

This is an open thread.

53 Responses to "Feminist Friday: This Too Shall Pass?"

I think you nailed it when you said that people have to be affected personally before it will sink in. It will take a parent being treated with suspicion when they go to their neighborhood pharmacy to fill a prescription for birth control pills for their daughter who needs them for medical reasons, not because they are encouraging their child to have premarital sex. It will take a young adult family member, just starting out in life, who has serious health problems with no health insurance who can now receive free healthcare for the indigent but will be financially devastated if forced to buy health insurance. This has happened to me and I am pissed off. I am sick and tired of something so basic as healthcare being regulated and influenced by godbag, religioso thugs and frakking thieves who don’t give a damn about people and who care only about their bottom line. It’s opened the eyes of some former Obot family members, but why does it have to get to this point? I don’t know, but let’s hope that, little by little, people will start to wake up.

Keep trying to jostle people. It does help.

Thanks, Janicen. I’m so sorry that you’ve experienced firsthand the train wreck of our health care system. I’ve only bumped up against it a couple of times, but so far have not needed my insurance for anything life-threatening. I am scared to think about what would happen if I did, though.

Actually, it may not. One of my fundie acquaitances recently lost her daughter to breast cancer. Daughter had no insurance, and treatment came late. She wants the government out of her life. Hospitals go to court regularly in order to treat leukemic children whose parents want to pray it away, I’m unclear of what it will take, shy of Libertarian Island/Ruby Ridge for them all to inhabit while the rest of us evolve.

Things are pretty f’d up, people just don’t realize how bad, yet.

WOW-MSNBC says that David Patterson will not seek re-election.

I actually linked to that article in my “winners and losers” paragraph, chat. I thought it was pretty amazing that this was some sort of game to privileged jackasses like Cillizza.

I am not too shocked about Paterson. That aide of his being charged with domestic violence was the last straw. He was not elected and not popular, although I thought he was pretty good and was hoping he’d be able to hang in there.

Get ready for Andrew Cuomo! According to polls, he is a shoo-in should he run. We Noo Yawkaz are suckers for our former Gov’s son. Plus, he seems like a guy with a decent amount of integrity. But then, so did Spitzer, dumb bastard that he is!

It didn’t look like his chances were great, but as of a few days ago, he was insisting that he’d run. Reality check, I guess.

Chat – I’ll bet he did still plan to run a couple of days ago, but I think that was before this happened.

Whoooooooops.

I’m sorry to hear that about Paterson. I liked him and let’s face it – he’s getting it from all sides, including getting stabbed in the back by his own party.

That whole story with the aide confuses me. How is any of it Paterson’s fault? I read it yesterday and I couldn’t make any sense of it, especially since all the Democrats quoted in it were all but blaming Paterson himself for beating that woman up.

That’s a sickening story about Paterson and his aide. I hope they’re both finished in politics.

From what I’ve read, DYB, it looks like Paterson was protecting the guy.

Janicen> That’s one thing that confused me. It sounds like Paterson spoke to this woman on the phone – but he says she called him. And then Paterson asked Cuomo to investigate. And people are upset by that. But Cuomo is investigating. So I’m still confused.

@13 – Yes, Janicen, that’s the general idea I’m getting too – they went back a long way, and despite the fact that he was violent towards his girlfriend, he somehow escaped any legal consequences from the state authorities. Seems like a “what did Paterson know and when did he know it” kind of thing.

If Paterson protected that POS, he is scum and doesn’t deserve to run a flea market. However, the words “innocent until proven guilty” do ring in my mind.

Meanwhile, in New York, the SnowPocalypse is in full glory!

17″ so far in New York, and it just keeps coming.

MB@17> Which only goes to show that there is no such thing as global warming! ;)

Well, DUH, DYB!!
;-)

Some days I don’t know whether to laugh or cry. Actually, that seems like most days, these days!

“That’s why I write about things we can do, some little, some big, that may jostle something or someone, have a butterfly effect that is infinitely greater than its actual intent. And I do try to posit solutions that have either worked in the past, or bring up ideas that may be new and controversial; something, anything that might help the desperate situation we are all in.”

Madamab, that’s why I’ve followed you here. The discussions between you, Chatblu, and all the great commenters are interesting and stimulating, but the emphasis on action is what sets your blog apart.

You have to go over to uppity woman’s site and read this post and view the videos by this woman Sarah Haskins. I’ve never heard of her before but these are funny in a thought-provoking way.

http://uppitywoman08.wordpress.com/2010/02/25/sarah-haskins-and-target-women/

Thanks, Jules! :-D

Speaking of chat, she is down with a sinus infection! Pauvre chat!

We’ve gotten 21 inches of snow already here in New York – 51 inches this year! It’s just nutty. Reminds me of 1996.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blizzard_of_1996

Governor David Paterson is expected to announce shortly that he will not run for re-election. I guess this scandal with his aide is too toxic for him to survive.

MB@22-oh boy! I know that feeling. :-(
I’m just now beginning to feel decent and still have the cough. It’s usually the last thing to clear up.

MB-I’m taking the Tesselon perles during the day and they work good, and then take the liquid gold cough medicine at night. It helps a lot.

I hope some of y’all got to Uppity’s place. She had a new vid for today’s post so I’m stealing it.

This woman is funny.

MB – I think for Paterson this scandal (whatever it is) – coupled with everything else (no money, low approval ratings, no party support) – is the last straw. Cuomo must be loving it. And I can’t even imagine the glee inside the White House.

Okay, so the White House’s “social secretary” is leaving. She was in charge of throwing parties. Literally. She was also blamed for that couple crashing the state dinner a couple of months back. What cracked me up was this quote from the AP article announcing her departure:

Rogers, 50, told the Chicago Sun-Times on Friday that she was leaving because she had achieved a major goal of the Obamas: turning the White House into the “people’s house” by opening it up to many of those who normally do not get to visit.

“My work was really to create this framework. I think I completed that work,” she told her hometown paper. “Our office has been able to lay the foundation for what will be known as the ‘people’s house’ and it has already taken shape.”

The Obamas, in their statement thanking her for all of her hard work (throwing parties is hard, as we all know) explained who Rogers let into the “people’s house:”

“When she took this position, we asked Desiree to help make sure that the White House truly is the people’s house and she did that by welcoming scores of everyday Americans through its doors, from wounded warriors to local schoolchildren to NASCAR drivers,” the president and Mrs. Obama said.

Okay, I’m pretty sure previous Presidents hosted all of the above. These people are full of shit!

DYB @15 and 18: I’m at the point that I can acknowledge that global warming is occurring, but I’m not sure that anyone has proved absolutely what is causing it. Don’t get me wrong, I have not doubt that less pollution is better than more pollution, but I’m starting to have serious reservations about the whole, “We have to invest hundreds of billions into…X or Y or Z without some substantiated proof as to what is really going on. From what I understand, science can prove absolutely that global warming is occurring, but it cannot be unequivocal about whether there is an external cause or whether it is a natural occurrence.

See how cynical I have become? I have to confess to having read Michael Crichton’s “State of Fear” with all of its footnotes and references, as a contributing factor to my skepticism. I also have to confess to being in a foul mood after attending a meeting with a financial planner who had a stimulating discussion with my husband as to what should be done with my frakking money. After a few minutes of listening to them discuss the options I said, “Yes, that’s all fine, but I am the customer, and I am leaving.” and I walked out the door. I have a voicemail of apology on my phone from the financial planner, a woman, but I’m still so mad I can’t see straight.

Fredster – I will definitely check those out. They look EXCELLENT. The misogyny in our ad culture is truly mindblowing!

Janicen@30: Ohhhh……I have a friend who came into some money from her father after he sold the family farm and then later passed away. So after all things were settled and stuff, she and her husband went to see the financial planner at their bank but *she* was the one in charge and the banker worked with her, just with her husband present.

That would tick me off too.

MB@31-You’ll love the one with Brinks/Broadview Security.

My position on the “science” of Global Warming is going to the theater of the absurd: I call for a stop to practicing all religions until God is a proven fact.

Fredster — I watched those Sarah Haskins videos and almost died laughing. She’s got a website at current.com with lots more. I hope her stuff goes viral.

Thank you for what I consider to be a ray of hope. Other people like me care. I am not alone

La-T-Da, I have stopped.

Thank you, wrensis. It’s good to know we’re all out her together, somewhere.

La-t-da – good to see you. I was just telling my husband a little while ago about your post in which you “confessed” that you were a communist and we were all calling each other “comrade.” ;-)

Janicen, for some reason people in finance and banking seem to be the absolute WORST about dealing with women. I’ve had problems with my account that were the bank’s fault, and nothing was resolved until I asked my husband to call them. After months, all it took was a man’s voice and voila! The issue was suddenly fixed, easy as pie. It’s infuriating!

LOL Plainjane! Well, well, well. Bayh actually said something I agree with! :-D

Jules@35: When I sat there watching I was just laughing my ass off! The Brinks was hysterical along with the yogurt one.

Thanks for the sympathy, MB.

MB, has there really been twenty inches of snow in NYC? I keep reading that but then the photos look like less.

Plainjane, that’s pretty funny. I keep thinking there’s something more the the Bayh thing. I know he’s not leaving just because the Republicans are a$$holes, because that’s nothing new. I keep wondering if Rham didn’t threaten to primary Bayh either because of his support for HRC or because of some other way Bayh didn’t toe the line and Bayh just said, “F-you, I won’t run for reelection. In fact, I might just decide to primary Obama right back!” That’s my secret wish, anyway.

OMG Fredster, she’s hilarious!

Oh janicen, you’re more than welcome.

I think that Bayh may be gearing up for an Independent run for President. He almost ran last time, I think – or maybe he was on a shortlist for a VP pick or something. Whatever, I don’t think he is done at all.

2012 could see more than one third-party candidate running for Pres.

Off to make dinner – BBL.

The BBC has some great articles about Global Warming. I’ve been following the “debate” because the UK University — the University of East Anglia — also is home to another group of earth scientists who do not understand nor use the Scientific Method in their research.

According to one article (I can find the references if anyone is interested) there different levels of acceptance (3 related to belief of Climate change & 3 related to denial). The extremes are complete denial that humans have anything what so ever to do with climate warning — to the ones who are willing to change their behavior — but they want more information.

Then there are the SCARE scientists — who are willing to sex up the data — or even make stuff up — in order to get attention. The problem is with the modeling software — and the methods used to “predict” weather behavior in the future.

Both the Scare Scientists and the Climate change deniers are harming the debate — because both sides are dogmatic (authoritarian personalities).

My feeling is that somewhere in the middle is the truth — the main point is that we don’t know all the variable. For instance the engine of the world’s climate are the massive ocean currents which move the water around the world — there is some indication that one or more of these currents may be shifting.

What we do know is that the UN Climate “experts” have misrepresented the facts — they have made up probability numbers (90% probability for Himalayan Glaciers melting in 2035 — those UN scientists claimed in their official document. There was NO data to back up that 90%. There are other major errors by this group — which have been used by the climate deniers.)

So let’s just use common sense — it is utterly stupid believe that humans have had no impact on the climate. There is evidence from legitimate scientists — and they share their data — so that that the data they use can be used by others. Science means repeatability and testing and retesting — and hypothesis being challenged. The jerks at the University of East Anglia — wanted everyone to just “believe” them ’cause they are the great scientists. NO — we still need proof and we still need to see the data.

I have another “observation” blog — which keeps me busy. One would think that the “hard” sciences would use the scientific method — but in earth science — Volcanologist — sometimes they play politics rather than use Scientific methods. Ironically the same errors we are seeing now with the Climate hot shots in East Anglia — I’ve been commenting on for over 10 years from Earth Scientists from the same dam*ed University that has given the world the sexing up of the climate data and the “modeling” used to “predict” the future.

Yes, I have a personal interest in the mis-use of science — I should be on a tropical island during the winter for health reasons. But the political “scientists” keep playing games with people’s lives. To the point that I don’t trust scientists and need to see the data myself before I will accept anything they say.

Sorry this was so long.

Northwestrain> I understand your skepticism. It’s hard to not be skeptical when some scientists have been proven to have made up numbers. But, as you say, it’s also ludicrous for the right-wingers to simply dismiss the human factor. I agree that climate change and global warming are a combination of natural occurrences and human factor. And it’s astonishingly dumb to think that over a century of pumping gases and pollution into the air on a colossal scale (from factories world-wide to cars), plus the destruction of our rain forests, has no effect on the world around us.

It is all about “energy” money and the energy companies will want it “proven” until the Arctic melts enough to get to the largest oil reserve in the world. Oh, wait, that is happening now. Russia just went and put a flag in a spot to claim some of it not too long ago.

Or America waits long enough until the ice cutters can get there before everyone else like the Pentagon report of 2004 brought up.

Or enough runoff occurs in the Rockies so more Nuclear plants can be built out of sight and out of mind in the AZ desert, in “the solar capital of the world”.

Was that too much of a scare tactic and dramatic and not scientific enough? We are taking advantage of the warming to keep doing what we do. The complete irresponsibility, really hubris, is astonishing.

But I quoted no scientific proof that it is man-made so this post was really just a waste of time.

We used to “believe” something called “Rain Follows the Plow”.

“This increased exposure to erosion was revealed when a severe drought struck the Great Plains in 1934. The native grasses that covered the prairie lands for centuries, holding the soil in place and maintaining its moisture, had been eliminated by the intensively increased plowing. The drought conditions caused the topsoil to grow dry and friable and it was simply carried away by the wind. The dusty soil aggregated in the air forming immense dust clouds which further prevented rainfall.”

Natural doubt followed by man-made industrialized activity prolonged the rain from returning in a natural cycle. We fixed it by taking on a simple technique called “crop rotation” but we learned nothing.

Natural “drought”, but natural “doubt” works too. Sorry for the typo, especially, when I was trying to “prove” a point in a non snarky manner.

Yes, I have to say I can’t understand how the extreme denial people can think we’re not affecting the environment at all. There’s mercury in the oceans, there are chemicals in our groundwater, and remember when we had discovered a hole in the ozone layer and we banned chlorofluorocarbons because of it?

Really, people can be clueless!

{{{{Madamab}}}} Fuzzy percieves you need a big ol’ Fuzzybear hug….its better than any other medicine I know about!

dont forget contour plowing and plowing under vegitation to reduce the need for petrochemical fertilizers….

Fuzzy – you are a very perceptive bear! Thank you so much for the virtual hug. Right back atcha!!!

{{{Fuzzy}}}

Comments are closed.

Next Empty Plates Protest in NYC: March TBD

Message: Tax cuts for the wealthy starve the rest of us. Jobs, Not Tax Cuts!

L 2012 – Support Your Local Lefties!

Blog Archive

Activism: Haiti

Activism: The Environment

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.