The Widdershins

Feminist Friday: Equal Pay, or Equal Wealth?

Posted by: madamab on: March 12, 2010

Her Wealth Could Be $0 Until She is 50

Her Wealth Could Be $0 Until She is 50

Via BDBlue at Corrente, comes this unbelievable study of “the wealth gap” and women of color. We have all heard of the income gap – women make, on average, 77 cents to every man’s dollar – but the wealth gap has been largely ignored. I’m so very thankful that this study has come along to shine the light on a very, very important way in which women of color are failing to gain societal equality.

First, let’s explore why the Lifting As We Climb Insight Center posits that wealth is important. All bolding is mine.

The current economic crisis has revealed why wealth is so important to the stability of households. Wealth, or net worth, refers to the total value of one’s assets minus debts. Without savings or wealth of some form, economic stability is built on a house of cards that quickly crumbles when income is cut or disrupted through job loss, reduced hours or pay, or if the family suffers an unexpected health emergency. [MB: This is yet another reason for universal health care that is a right - not based on income or employment - as if we needed one!]

As the current crisis continues to unfold, it has become all too clear that it is not just “poor” people who are losing their homes to foreclosure in record numbers; even households with some wealth found that they did not have enough to ride out the still unfolding economic downturn.

Wealth impacts not just current economic security, but retirement security as well. With concerns over the solvency of Social Security and the shrinking number of jobs that provide pensions, it is of increasing importance that people have the means to save for their own retirement.

Wealth is also tied to the well-being of the next generation, as it provides parents with the ability to help pay for their children’s college education, and can also be passed down from generation to generation. In fact, the intergenerational transfer of wealth is one of the reasons why racial wealth gaps from policies long ago have become entrenched.

According to this study, then, a woman’s ability to survive misfortune depends on wealth, not income. There are many reasons why women of color tend to have more difficulties accumulating wealth:

Some may wonder if gender differences in wealth are important since so many people get married and presumably pool resources. But about half of all households are headed by single (defined as never married, widowed, or divorced) persons, which makes the wealth gap between men and women a reality for a large percentage of people. Also, about half of all marriages end in divorce. Furthermore, men and women are marrying at later ages, leaving women with more years in which they are self-supporting. In fact, women now spend more of their adult years single than married. The women’s wealth gap is also central to understanding the racial wealth gap—particularly for black households—because black women are less likely to marry and to remain married. Given the current trends of rates of divorce, the increasing number of children born to unwed parents, and rising ages at first marriage, the wealth gap for women is of considerable significance.

Now, keep in mind that this study was done in 2007, before the housing bubble burst and millions of Adjustable Rate Mortgages (ARMs) came due. There is much evidence that people of color were targeted for these mortgages, and indeed, women were targeted even further within that group. Nonetheless, even with this relatively conservative data, the results for women of color are staggering.

Excluding vehicles, single black women have a median wealth of $100 and Hispanic women $120 respectively, while their same-race male counterparts have $7,900 and $9,730. The median wealth of single white women is $41,500. To put it another way, single black and Hispanic women have one penny of wealth for every dollar of wealth owned by their male counterparts and a tiny fraction of a penny for every dollar of wealth owned by white women.

With so little in reserve, half of all single black and Hispanic women could not afford to take an unpaid sick day or to even have a major appliance repaired without going into debt.

The precarious financial situation of women of color is also evident when looking at those with zero or negative wealth, (negative wealth occurs when the value of one’s assets is lower than the value of their debts). Nearly half of all single black and Hispanic women have zero or negative wealth (see Figure 2).

Never-married women of color experience the largest wealth disadvantage, with a median wealth of zero (see Table 1). Women of color who are divorced fare better, with a median wealth of $4,200, but this is still only 26% of the wealth of divorced men of color, 8% of the wealth of divorced white women, and 5% of the wealth of divorced white men.

Young women ages 18-35, whether white or non-white, are beginning their adult years with a median wealth of zero, meaning that at least half of women in this age group had no wealth or had debts greater than the value of their assets (see Table 3). However, while white women in the prime working years of ages 36-49 have a median wealth of $42,600 (still only 61% of their white male counterparts), the median wealth for women of color is only $5. Prior to age 50, women of color have virtually no wealth.

Okay, let me repeat that.

However, while white women in the prime working years of ages 36-49 have a median wealth of $42,600 (still only 61% of their white male counterparts), the median wealth for women of color is only $5. Prior to age 50, women of color have virtually no wealth.

In other words, if you are a Black or Hispanic woman, your chance of getting and keeping any significant economic security prior to the age of 50 is extremely small.  A white woman has a huge advantage over a woman of color, but still lags behind white men by 39%.

While so many of us, myself included, have been talking about equal pay for equal work and the 23% income gap, the Insight Center has been paying attention to a much greater and deeper issue: equal wealth. The wealth gap for women of color shows just what a potent combination institutionalized racism and misogyny are; but if you look at the gaps between men of color and women of color, you see that misogyny multiplies racism exponentially.

I hope that this study is propagated widely. Readers, please do what you can to raise awareness about this immense economic and social injustice.

In the meantime, I have added to the Insight Center to our Resources for Women page.

This is a stunned open thread.

(I know the woman in this video is white, but it’s the perfect song for this post. Goddess bless Donna Summer; she knew what she was singing about.)

Advertisement

29 Responses to "Feminist Friday: Equal Pay, or Equal Wealth?"

Wow, this is shocking. I had no idea. And this study was done in 2007. All of us have lost considerable wealth since then but this economic depression has to have been especially devastating to black and hispanic women.

If this study was done in 2007, I’m betting that the numbers are much, much worse now. Property values (at least down here) dropped by 50%. Any stock values may be even worse.

Both of you are exactly right.

I think many of us, including myself, have not been aware of this method of studying how women are doing financially. Most likely the UN has done some studies, and Hillary’s probably up on it, but in America, I’m not sure how much women’s organizations have been concentrating on it.

I just read about this study a couple of days ago, and like you, I was shocked. If the median wealth of WOC in the 36-49 age demographic is a mere $5, that means that nearly half of those women have a negative net worth. And absolutely no cushion against financial emergency whatsoever.

Thanks for highlighting this story today, MB.

Thanks, Nell. I just feel like I’ve been dumped in a bucket of cold water. Equal pay for equal work? Okay, but…what if we lose our jobs?

I just spoke with my WOC friend from Jamaica and she was not shocked at all. Being from another country, she can see the racism/misogyny much more clearly than those of us who have been raised in America. She has, of course, experienced this discrimination herself, although she is now in a good position and probably far above the median that the study listed.

@4 and 5: I’m pretty certain that, at this point, nearly 75% of all women fall into trhe category. In my case, my property value fell by 50%, which took me from fairly to clinging by my fingernails. I’m certain that I’m far from alone in this category. WOC, by this standard, are probably in deeply negative territory.

@6: As a “gut” number, I’ll bet you are dead-on.

I could be wrong, but the way I understand these things, unless your house is paid off already, it would count as a liability, not an asset. So, any woman (upper-income or not) who purchased an ARM would most likely be hundreds of thousands into negative wealth at the time of purchase(unless they have enough savings or paid-off property to balance it out).

Just horrifying.

Exactly.

Just a quick note here. First they weren’t going to do the arteriogram on the momster and then they decided to. Since they weren’t I didn’t bother to go over. Next thing I know I get a call from the doc saying it was done.

All 3 of the arteries in her rt leg have blockages, two completely. So, the doc wants to do a by-pass on Friday. This is not a cabg, but rather on the rt leg. He said they will try to use one of her veins if possible and if not use an artificial thing.

In one way I’m not worried. She’s 84 and has had the two ortho surgeries now along with the arteriogram so I told the doc to go for it. Really she has no alternatives and she’s come through these other procedures fine.

Me on the other hand, not so much. I’ve got a stomach virus that’s apparently going around and this, apparently, is not just a one or two day one but it l-a-s-t-s!! So lots of Sprite and jello and maybe some toast and that’s about it. Oh and the doc told me to stay the hell away from the momster. :lol:

If I understand correctly, they’ll bypass from a clear place in her leg or something to hook up further down into her leg. I’m going to do some medline or other searches to see what I can find, but overall I’m not too concerned.

The sprite and jello are fine. You can also enjoy the famous BRATT diet – bananas, applesauce, rice, tea and toast. Perhaps the compromised circulation has contributed to the malunion of the ankle, and clearly to the skin changes. Hopefully, this will get things stabilized for her. My thoughts are with you.

The sprite and jello are fine. You can also enjoy the famous BRATT diet – bananas, applesauce, rice, tea and toast. Perhaps the compromised circulation has contributed to the malunion of the ankle, and clearly to the skin changes. Hopefully, this will get things stabilized for her. My thoughts are with you.

Chat@10-11: Nanners? I can have nanners? But I guess a peanut butter and nanner sandwich is out huh?

re the circulation: Well it definitely was a problem with the surgical sites healing, along with her trying to walk on that leg when she shouldn’t have.

Ah…plain, dry toast. So appetizing. Maybe I can try to spread some of the jello on it?

What have they got in mind for the fracture site, other tan restoring adequate circulation, which will be a good start?

The fx itself (the bone) has healed. Orthopod removed the plate and screws and will (after this surgery) I guess it will be trying to get those sites to heal. I have a feeling that any walking she’ll do after this she’ll have a brace or something on the leg or at least around the ankle to help give support. The orthopod didn’t really discuss it too much.

Rachael Maddow is on. She had Nancy on last night and bought her bullshit and is shocked, now…schocked I tell you to hear Nancy now is saying it’s just not in there!

Sad, isn’t it. Rachel is an otherwise rather bright woman.

Chat@16-Yes it is. She is an intelligent woman and she did lambast Pelosi on the show. If I can find this I’ll try to put a link in. You usually can’t find any of the MSNBC things on youtube but I’ll look around on MSNBC in a day or two.

About what?

Oh, the thing where she was digging Pelosi (the day after her interview with her) over the public option thing. I wasn’t clear in 15. Pelosi is now saying public option, no because “it’s not in there”. 8O

It sure as hell isn’t there in the Senate bill. She does not lie. I wonder if the movement in the Senate to add it has gained any momentum??

Fredster – OMG! Feel better. I’m sure that Chat will lead you in the right direction to get over your tummy troubles.

Guys, do you really think the “public option” means anything? I’m amazed. Don’t let the propaganda getcha! It’s another marketing slogan, like Obama.

*How will it be paid for?

*Whom will it cover?

*What advantage will it offer those who accept it?

Anyone?

Bueller?

The public option is nothing but a distraction. There is a real reform bill in the House and everyone is pretending it doesn’t exist.

It’s truly amazing that Medicare for All, which is the best, most practical solution on offer (and the fastest to implement, by the way) is being shoved under the rug by the bought-off Congress and President. FDR and LBJ are rolling in their graves, and as for the Clintons? Heaven knows what they must be thinking and saying.

No wonder poor Bill had a cardiac incident. I would have too, watching Obama take this country even further in the wrong direction, knowing that your wife would have been so much better for the job, knowing that Obama has taken his legacy and thrown it in the garbage.

Supposedly they are up to 41 senators who “signed on”, but it seems that might be with a wink and nod. :roll: Bastards.

Just talked to the nurse at the hospital and what they are going to do on Monday is a fem-pop bypass on the right leg. She had the one done previously on the left so this won’t be anything new, only last time when it was done back home she developed a massive infection at the surg. site, so hope we don’t go through that again!

MB: Supposedly and from what I understood it would be like the FEHB plan, but of course I’m not sure. It could just be opening up Medicaid which I hope it isn’t!

Grayson introduced a 4 page Medicare buy in plan yesterday.

I would totally support a Medicare buy-in, if the bill allowed for the “buy-in” part to end at some time in the next few years.

Actually, I have to admit that I have always thought a Medicare buy-in was a great idea. Medicare for All advocates would probably disagree with me and probably for good reasons, but I think people would totally go for it.

Imagine how low you could get the cost of medical care with a pool that was suddenly expanded to hundreds of millions of people?

And hey, those of us who are employed (or were) are already paying for Medicare anyway, from our taxes. Just up the amount a little bit for each person, and voila!

I’m sure there’s some reason why this is a horrible plan, but I just don’t see it yet.

Night all – must rest la voce for singing tomorrow morning! It’s going to be a monsoon here. I understand Fl0rida and Alabama are having big storms as well.

The buy in would not be cheap, but if you pay for that and a medigap supplement you know that you are covered 100% of the costs. I could go with that.

SoFla has been under water since about noon, which usually this time of year means an incoming cold front.

You guys got what came through here and continued to the east. And yes there’s a cold front coming. We hit 70 yesterday and the high for Sat. will be 55.

Have been a little concerned about my friend who lives outside of WPB. Saw some shots of flooding there on TWC I think.

Comments are closed.

Next Empty Plates Protest in NYC: March TBD

Message: Tax cuts for the wealthy starve the rest of us. Jobs, Not Tax Cuts!

L 2012 – Support Your Local Lefties!

Blog Archive

Activism: Haiti

Activism: The Environment

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.