Posted by: bluelyon on: July 9, 2010
Far be it from me to defend Michael Steele or Barack Obama’s pathetic asses. Live by the sword, die by the sword and all that.
By now most everyone has heard about the big-ass can of worms that Micheal Steele opened the other day when he spoke the truth. Not that everything he said was true. But most of it was. You know it, and so do I. Let’s get the stupid part out of the way.
Rather than playing the standard version of Tribalism™ which would have consisted of throwing spit balls at the Democrats and tell them how they’re Doing! It! Wrong! when it comes to Afghanistan, Steele went for the Hail Mary shot and, in a statement that would make 1984‘s Ministry of Truth look like pikers, placed the entire Afghanistan fiasco at Barack Obama’s feet.
“Keep in mind again, federal candidates, this was a war of Obama’s choosing. This is not something the United States had actively prosecuted or wanted to engage in.”
Michael Steele attempted to rewrite history and thought he could get away with it. Certainly we’ve see very little fact-checking and ever so much stenography by the media over the past decades, so who can blame Steele for thinking that no one would call him on this? And of course, the impotent Democrats would take umbrage. Eh, par for the course. But poor Michael Steele, his own party wants to can him. 
So, we’ve got The Stupid out of the way. Now for The Truth of his statement.
“Well, if he’s such a student of history, has he not understood that you know that’s the one thing you don’t do, is engage in a land war in Afghanistan? All right, because everyone who has tried, over a thousand years of history, has failed.”
I hope Mr. Steele will forgive me if I don’t get all excited about his sudden epiphany. I take that back. I don’t give a flying you-know-what if he forgives me or not.
Never one to ignore an opportunity to have an intelligent discussion on our war policy be as tribalist as the Republicans, the DNC issued a statement that, as Glenn Greenwald put it, continued the Cycle of Stupidity. The DNC’s issued a statement that sounded just like the same sort of crap the Republicans threw at anyone who dared to question Bush’s wars. Using every trope in the book, be it walking away from the fight (shades of Viet Nam), 9/11! 9/11! 9/11! (see Family Guy), or inferring that opposition to never-ending war doesn’t Support The Troops (yeah, because wanting them continually in harm’s way, rather than safe at home is so repellent), the DNC doubles down.
And they wonder why their donors are slipping away.
Yeah, I know. Michael Steele is an ass. He says stupid partisan shit. News at eleven. And Steele, gave more ammo to those in his party that would like to see him gone.
And lost in all of this faux outrage is the truth of Michael Steele’s statement and the question he (for partisan gain) and millions before him (for solid reasons) are asking: Why are we still there?
Fareed Zakaria is asking too.
“If Al Qaeda is down to 100 men there at the most,” Zakaria asked, “why are we fighting a major war?”
Zakaria noted that the war is costing the U.S. a fortune in both blood and treasure. “Last month alone there were more than 100 NATO troops killed in Afghanistan.,” the CNN host said. “That’s more than one allied death for each living Al Qaeda member in the country in just one month.
“The latest estimates are that the war in Afghanistan will cost more than $100 billion in 2010 alone. That’s a billion dollars for every member of Al Qaeda thought to be living in Afghanistan in one year.”
Maybe, just maybe we might be able to have this conversation? Can we finally talk about how endless war is sucking us dry? That pouring billions, no trillions, of dollars into this rat hole is killing us as a democracy?
To sum up, the President can do all of the following, in most cases without meaningful appeal or a trial: execute Americans, imprison people indefinitely, spy on anyone he wants, forbid people from flying, torture people, kidnap people, forbid people from associating with whoever they want, and deny them the right to speak freely anywhere except in small cordoned off zones.
This is America?
This is what the American dream has come to?
Your founders warned you about this. Warned you that standing armies and unrestrained banks would cost you your freedom.
And the sad thing is that most Americans are ok with it.
Are Americans who don’t believe that everyone is endowed with inalienable rights still Americans worth the name?
Can we finally talk intelligently about this, without the rhetoric? Oh, who am I kidding? Of course not. The American people might come out on top, and the PTB will never let that happen.
Take it away Major General Smedley Butler.
Whew, that’s one thought provoking video! Good catch Blue, and I totally agree with him.
Contrary to the Smedley Butler video, sometimes a war is worth fighting:
http://davenewbold.com/images/2-Auschwitz.jpg
OT:
As I was walking down to the grocery store this morning, a Lexus LX was parked on the sidewalk, blocking my path.
I had to walk out in the busy street to get around it.
I noticed that it had a bright yellow “Don’t Tread on Me” license plate on the front. LOL.
Beata@7: Couldn’t you find a car key or apt key or something to leave the driver a souvenir for parking like that? Was it in a fire lane?
Lambert at corrente has really been on a roll lately. He is having a field day with the Dems’ spurned lovers in the bankster and related businesses and their taking the $$$s to the other side.
Is this something we can support?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/07/09/AR2010070903716.html?hpid=topnews
Beata, from the article:
The groups involved represent the core of the first-time voters who backed President Obama — including the National Council of La Raza, NAACP, AFL-CIO, SEIU and the United States Student Association. (The effort is separate from the Democratic Party’s plan to spend $50 million trying to reach those same voters.)
Their aha moment happened after the health-care overhaul passed this spring. Liberal groups, who focused their collective strength to push the bill against heavy resistance, felt relevant and effective for the first time in a long while. That health-care coalition — composed of civil rights groups, student activists and labor leaders — liked the winning feeling.
If they feel the “health care” overhaul was a success, they aren’t a group I’d want to be associated with.
well its the second weekend in July time for my anual tubing down “The River That Trys to Drown Fuzzy” Cross your fingers and hope for no cramps ths year I have SPF 50 sun block, been eating high potasium foods (to prevent leg cramps,have a big floppy WSun Bonnett popular with southern “Ladies” for gardening and gay men for any outside activity, extra clothes tooth brush and floss also packed!
Fingers crossed here I go!
@ 14 Smells like Axelrod cronies to me starting their 2012 Obama campaign. Cheap way for Obama to get his “base” back. If those groups gave a shit, they would be picking their candidate to primary Obama. This is further determinate to the word “progressive”. FOX will paint them as “Socialist”. The faux battle will begin. I agree with Fredster. They considered health care a “win”!
And besides that, LaRaza were fools in AZ in the primaries. Hillary had picked a former president of LaRaza to co-chair her campaign. Obama gave speeches.
Well Fuzzy, have a safe tubing trip and don’t let the snakes bite you in the ass!
Comments are closed.
July 9, 2010 at 7:49 AM
That’s the whole crux of the matter, isn’t it? We cannot afford to support ourselves because we are spending $5B+/month on this damn war/