The Widdershins

Activist Wednesday: What Color is Your Midterm Parachute?

Posted by: madamab on: September 8, 2010

Since our Dear Leader has come back from his umpty-thousandth vacation, he seems as energized as…well, as he ever is. (He rates about a 3 out of 10 on the President-In-A-Time-Of-Multiple-Crises scale, in my opinion.) He seems to be everywhere: whining about the mean ol’ GOP here, throwing too much money at tax cuts and not enough money at infrastructure there, and in the middle of all that, posing for feel-good photos with Abbas and Netanyahu while leaving all the real work to people with the first initial “Hillary” and the last initial “Clinton.” (Preznit-ing is hard work! Does Baracky need a pillow?)

The reason for all this furious-for-him activity is quite clear: mid-term elections are coming up, and the Democrats look like they are going to lose. Big. (Remember how Obama told us that the Democrats weren’t going to lose seats in 2010  because of His Mighty Awesomeness? Yeah, how’s that workin’ out for you, Dems?) The pundits are theorizing as fast as their little fingers can type about why the Republicans, just a year and 9 months into President No We Can’t's first (and most likely, only) term, are set to sweep the House (and maybe gain Senate seats as well) like a giant broom constructed of tastefully shredded Qurans and birth control prescriptions.

Here are some of the “big thoughts” issuing from the “big brains” in the corporate media.

Kevin Drum blames the economy because polls show that voters still feel the Democratic Party represents them better, in general.

Several pundits are riding the “anti-incumbent” hobby horse as hard as they can. The polls just indicate that people don’t trust the government anymore, so they’re determined to vote the current bums out.

Greg Sargent shows that voters think the GOP, when returned to office, will offer something different from the Bush economic policies of old (which even Republican voters know now were horrendous). Thus, voters are not buying the brilliant Dem idea of running against Bush two years after he left the White House. No one could have predicted that message would fail. But don’t worry, because charismatic campaign guru David Plouffe has a new video out. All we need is the right message! (Hey, I’ve got an idea! Is “It’s morning in America” taken?)

Huffpo is a more comforting place for Democratic loyalists to hang out, with AxelRove giving the mighty blog a super-de-duper exclusive about how extreme a GOP Congress would be and Dylan Loewe claiming the future of the Blue Party is so bright, he’s gotta wear shades.

Gallup dutifully throws a “nothing to see here” wrench into the bad-news works by claiming that Democrats and Republicans are tied in a generic ballot. Uh-huh. I hear Dick Cheney is running in the Boston Marathon this year.

Golly gee whiz. Is that really the best they can do?

Here is what I think.

Of course the economy is a huge factor. (By “the economy,” I mean unemployment and overwhelming consumer debt due to the housing bubble collapsing, not the bullshit we’re constantly hearing about the deficit, which no one has actually cared about since 2000.) It appears that voters are correctly understanding that Bush’s economic policies led us into this mess. But what these many articles fail to point out is that Obama has continued, in every way, shape AND form, those same Bush economic policies. The TARP was Bush’s plan, for heaven’s sake – he spent half of it and let Obama spend the other. If that didn’t help people draw a straight line right away from Bushonomics to Obamanomics, then I don’t know what would have, but the fact that Obama is planning to call for $100 billion in further business tax cuts is probably the last straw. This is why voters are hoping that Republicans have learned from Bush’s mistakes and will usher in a new era of prosperity and jobs, because frankly, the Democrats have only learned…that they will become filthy rich if they continue to follow where Bush led.

Two words: Broken promises. You would have to be deaf, dumb and blind (or a paid “professional Democrat”) not to know that Obama hasn’t kept his promises to the people who are supposed to be running to the polls voting blue this year. After Gitmo not being closed, torture and rendition continuing, the wars continuing, women’s rights and LGBT rights losing ground every day (I’m STILL seeking Smith-Lipinski, by the way!), and worst of all, no New Deal 2.0, what in the name of the Goddess do leftish people have to be excited about? Health Whatever? Hard to believe that anyone thought that toxic piece of crap would guarantee Democratic victory in 2010, but when you have a political class that puts Wall Street over Main Street every time, you tend to end up with these types of hollow corporate giveaways disguised as victory for the “small people.”

Obama, self-declared Supreme Leader of the Party, just sucks. I mean, seriously. He is not a leader, he is a campaigner and a speechmaker. His response to BP’s OilMageddon in the Gulf was monumentally slow, fundamentally dishonest, and deeply committed…to propping up the status quo. The Republicans recently “blocked” a Presidential commission with subpoena powers to investigate the whole mess, but as we all know, it’s not as if they really filibustered to do so. I’d love to see Mitch McConnell attempting to maintain his fauxrage for 24 straight hours. It would be must-see TV! And after the Republicans stopped filibustering (which they’d have to do eventually), the legislation would pass. See how easy that would be if the Dems had any desire to stop the Party of No?

What choice do people have? How are people going to register their disgust with the people who promised them the moon and gave them green cheese instead? The strongest method (although not my preferred method) is to vote for the other guys. Everyone knows that. And the Green Party, nationally, is a joke; especially when every election cycle brings stories like this one.  Get it together, Greens, PLEASE.

So, what color is your midterm parachute? Are you voting red, blue, green, white (aka, “None of the Above”), or rainbow (a mixture depending on the candidate)? Cast your vote below!

This is an open thread.

Advertisement

44 Responses to "Activist Wednesday: What Color is Your Midterm Parachute?"

I voted “Green” because from now on, I’m going to vote for the third party candidate whenever I can. I can’t bring myself to vote Republican, but the Democrats have not yet earned my vote. I’m basically voting “None of the above” by voting for the third party.

None of the Above here. Because there will be no difference between Rs and Ds. Actually, maybe, just maybe, with Rs back in there Ds will start taking the Left a bit more seriously. Assuming, of course, they don’t move further to the Right.

I’m a NOTA. Great post, Mad.

I’m voting rainbow, I guess, because I’m voting Maloney in the primaries and NOTA in the election.

DYB, I am pretty encouraged about this new org. Seems like the momentum for Oct 2nd is building.

I’m voting Rainbow. I can’t stomach the thought of Dan-”The Family”-Man Coats as my senator for six years. He will probably win anyway.

Ed Schultz continues to promote the “One Nation Coming Together” rally on his show. I have mixed feelings about him but then I do about so many people these days. As long as he is backing a good cause, I say more power to him.

@5: The name of the organization is “One Nation Working Together”! ( Or something like that. ) LOL.

LOL Beata! Indeed!

I’ll vote for the Dem, Charlie Melancon in the Senate race to try to get rid of that ogre David Vitter. As far as my congr. district, the LA 3rd will probably be the one that’s done away with in reapportionment. The Repubs had a primary for that, the Dems only had one candidate running. He’s a first time candidate, an Indian-American who nobody down there has heard of before. The repubs are running some guy who has been around LA state government for years. To be honest I probably won’t worry about that race since the district is going to go away in 2 years.

Rosh Hashanah begins tonight. Ketiva ve-chatima tovah, MB!

Happy New Year MB! A blessing on your house!

I know burning the Koran…and building the Islamic Center in the shadow of the WTC disaster…I love the First Ammendment and I am logical so I have no choice I must defend the rights of both groups to do as they please regardless of whether either is the sensible thing to do!

Thing about the 1st ammendment its a Sword that cuts both ways…As The Muslim People are about to learn…and Krama I am sure is at work here too!

That guy is such a jerk, Fredster. Seems like a publicity stunt to me.

Thank you for the lovely holiday wishes! Have had a busy job-hunting day, and now am preparing to sing services tonight!

@8: I read that Bobby Jindal refused to endorse Vitter. Good for him.

Fuzzy – are people saying the preacher doesn’t have the legal right to burn a Quran? As stupid and hateful as that idea is, I would think most people understand he is not breaking any laws.

Not that I’ve seen. Every commentator has stressed that it is not illegal.

This is what I don’t get. How does the First Amendment keep coming up in these situations? Are we now not allowed to dislike those who use their right to free speech in a way we don’t approve of?

Chat@15: I read something that he’s held back some endorsements but didn’t check the article. I’ll have to do so now.

MB@18: Well, do you remember the Skokie IL thing with the Nazi group? The ACLU went to bat for the Nazi group to allow them to have their protest march. People were very upset about the ACLU acting in behalf of the group but I think they used 1st Amendment protections as the reason back then.

http://www.skokiehistory.info/chrono/nazis.html

Long article regarding this and I hate even putting this in here with one of your religion’s High Holy Days coming up. Still it’s thought provoking:

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb6389/is_1_88/ai_n28807383/

Chat@15:

Well I did kinda screw it up, but you’ll get the drift and the link.

Well, hell. I thought that maybe, just once, we would be treated to a principled stand from “the party of family values”.

From “lil Bobby Jindal”? Nope, not when there’s the possibility of cash involved. He probably was given a stern talking to by the RNC. :roll:

Sorry Madamab I think its OK to dislike people who use there 1st ammendment rights in ways that we disapprove of (I do it daily every time I listen to Glenn Beck or Ann Coulter flap their jaw) sorry if I was unclear.

What I will do is defend these dumbasses right to do something stupid like burn the Q’uran or build a Islamic center even though these idiots know that what they are doing is insensitive and hurtful to others.

My whole problem is when people cannot see the parallel in both these cases. I

The difference between us and them is we hate the message but still defend the rights of those who wish to be stupid.

Heck I cant stand the whole pro-life andti feminist right wing crowd I think their entire philosophy is bogus! But I will die for there continued right to be wrong!

Thats all I am saying…

I think it escapes the muslim community around the world that the same rights that allow them to build an islamic center in the shadow of the WTC also allows that total tool here in gainesville to burn the Q’uran. Even if they dont like it I expect them to acknowledge that they cant pick a choose to apply freedom. Otherwise they are nothing but spoiled children!

That is what frosts my wheaties!

I lived in Illinois at the time of the march. But at that time people were trying to legally stop it, so the argument made sense.

Now, not so much.

MB said:

I lived in Illinois at the time of the march. But at that time people were trying to legally stop it, so the argument made sense.

Now, not so much.

Well, it didn’t make sense to me then and still doesn’t now. When I was digging up those two links it came to me (or I was reminded) that the Nazi party USA or whatever most probably picked Skokie for the particular reason that there was a large number of Jews living there.

Fredster, I’m quite sure you’re right about where the march was. The North Shore of Chicago is very Jewish.

It was so painful as a young girl, to know that the sick fucks who marched were doing nothing legally wrong. I always thought that their march should fall under “hate speech,” but I guess it didn’t qualify – although I can think of very little that is more hateful than a Nazi!

Ah well. The march was a long time ago and I don’t think there’s been another one since.

I have to chime in and say that over the past 24 or so hours I’ve seen multiple blog posts on multiple sites that are propagating the Obamarite meme of “Republicans are the main funders of the Green party”, so it seems to be the big new “talking point” for a D party that is seeing the handwriting on the wall. I guess if they are paying attention to you, it means you’re striking a nerve, but people, the “dirty tricks” of suborning third parties in elections go both ways, with D’s doing the same thing, (just one example in MI:
http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20100903/NEWS01/9030387/Michigan-Tea-Party-has-some-Democratic-ties&template=fullarticle)
The answer is not to blow off third party effectiveness, but to work towards a better system that allows true participation in our politics of more than the D/R corporatist party. If the rumblings I’m hearing are true, I predict a stronger Green party after this mid-term, and we can build from there.

@26 – Amen, Fuzzy!!

Julia, from your lips to the National Green Party’s ears!

Heaven forbid I should propagate an Obamarite meme! But, this type of thing has happened for many years with the Green Party. Nader himself took Repub money.

Your point about Dem Party dirty tricks is well-stated, however. Obama took millions from Bush Pioneers, so one need look no further than Dear Leader himself to find an example. The thing is, if the Green Party wants to be taken seriously, it has to be different from both legacy Parties, doesn’t it?

MB@29: That’s why I even hesitated to bring up the analogy. But the ACLU and others said it was a free speech 1st Amendment issue so I guess it’s the same as the idiot preacher who wants to burn Korans.

But it’s only a free-speech issue if people are arguing the Quran-burning should be illegal. Which they’re not. That’s why the argument is a red herring IMHO.

I do think it’s pathetic that anyone would burn a book of any sort, much less one that is held as holy by a billion people. I wonder how that preacher would feel about someone burning his Bible?!

@33 Love your immediate use of “Obamarite”, I just started spreading that one today! :-) As far as differentiating ourselves from the legacy parties, we already do, by not accepting corporate $$ of any kind. Nader took money from some Repubs, it’s true, but they were individuals, and frankly, my campaign doesn’t ask for Party affiliation before accepting $$ (what litle there is-I should probably use “cents”, but that key has disappeared), and I couldn’t begin to try and parse who is what.
As for the “Nader was republican funded” meme, it’s an old one, and was effective in the past, but truth got in the way:

http://www.counterpunch.org/wire10192004.html

At least, the D’s haven’t started using that canard lately, but I guess I should expect to see it soon (sigh).

“Obamarite” is very cool!

I wish the Green Party would make a stand in NYC. It’s such a Democratic town, though. Maybe after the mid-terms the Party will venture on over here. There are quite a few lefties who are looking for a Dem alternative, I would imagine.

@37..Well, if YOU’RE already “there”, maybe they’ll come to YOU…hint, hint (I’d love to see you run!)

Hmmm. Well, I’m already out of work, so I wouldn’t be losing any money. LOL!

You sure have a way with words, Madamab

Republicans, just a year and 9 months into President No We Can’t’s first (and most likely, only) term, are set to sweep the House (and maybe gain Senate seats as well) .

like a giant broom constructed of tastefully shredded Qurans and birth control prescriptions.

(This is the part I wanted highlighted)

Hee – I was pretty proud of that one, Jane Plain! ;-)

I will leave you all with this very interesting link:

Hillary’s Star Rises

Note they keep pushing the idea that Hillary and Joe (Who?) Biden will swap jobs in 2012. The story says she “shook her head silently” when this idea was posited to her. That means “you’re a fucking idiot” in Hillary-ese.

Night all!

Republicans, just a year and 9 months into President No We Can’t’s first (and most likely, only) term, are set to sweep the House (and maybe gain Senate seats as well) .

And I wonder what the electorate will be saying a year to 14 months after the Rethugs have control? That’s the infuriating and maddening thing about it; nothing is going to be any better for anyone other than the rich.

Comments are closed.

Next Empty Plates Protest in NYC: March TBD

Message: Tax cuts for the wealthy starve the rest of us. Jobs, Not Tax Cuts!

L 2012 – Support Your Local Lefties!

Blog Archive

September 2010
M T W T F S S
« Aug   Oct »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  

Activism: Haiti

Activism: The Environment

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.